By CMP Publications
CMP’s investigative team has uncovered troubling signs that this regional sitting may be less about addressing the needs of struggling Ugandans and more about advancing hidden political agendas.
The True Architects Behind the Move
While the decision to hold Parliament in Gulu was publicly championed by Speaker Anita Among, our investigation reveals that this idea was heavily influenced by key figures within the ruling party. These individuals, whose names remain closely guarded, are said to have orchestrated this regional sitting as part of a broader strategy to distract the public from pressing national issues and to shore up political support in Northern Uganda ahead of the next election cycle.
According to sources close to the matter, the idea of a regional Parliament session was first floated in closed-door meetings with top party strategists. The goal? To create a spectacle that would divert attention from the mounting economic challenges faced by Ugandans across the country, while simultaneously projecting an image of a government that is in touch with the needs of rural communities.
A Diversion from Uganda’s Real Struggles
As the government puts on a show of caring for Gulu’s residents, many are left wondering what tangible benefits will come from this session. The improved sanitary facilities at Pece Primary School are certainly welcome, but they do little to address the systemic issues that plague Uganda’s education and healthcare systems. For many Ugandans, this regional Parliament sitting feels like a hollow gesture—an attempt to distract from the deepening economic crisis, rampant corruption, and deteriorating public services that continue to afflict the nation.
What is particularly concerning is the timing of this event. With inflation on the rise, unemployment at alarming levels, and healthcare services crumbling, critics argue that the government should be focusing on comprehensive reforms and policy solutions, rather than staging regional sittings that may amount to little more than political theatre.
The Dark Side of the Regional Sitting
Behind the scenes, there are whispers that this regional sitting is also serving as a test run for future political maneuvers. Some insiders suggest that the ruling party is exploring the possibility of using similar events to rally support in other politically strategic regions, all while avoiding the tough questions about governance and accountability that continue to haunt the regime.
Moreover, there is growing concern that the resources allocated to this event—including the transportation, accommodation, and allowances for MPs—could have been better spent on addressing the real needs of the people. Instead, these funds are being used to stage an event that, for many, does little to alleviate the daily struggles they face.
What Should Ugandans Expect?
As this regional sitting comes to a close, Ugandans are left with more questions than answers. Will this event lead to meaningful change, or will it be remembered as another empty promise? What concrete actions will be taken to address the issues raised during the session, and will the government follow through on its commitments?
The dark side of this regional Parliament sitting lies in the possibility that it is being used as a tool for political gain, rather than a genuine effort to improve the lives of Ugandans. As the dust settles in Gulu, it is crucial for citizens to remain vigilant and demand transparency and accountability from their leaders.
Ugandans should expect that this event, like many before it, may ultimately serve the interests of a select few, rather than the greater good. The true test will be whether the government can deliver on its promises and take meaningful steps to address the systemic issues that continue to hold the country back. Until then, the spectacle of a regional Parliament sitting may be just that—a spectacle, with little substance behind it.